By John W. Whitehead
“It is the responsibility of the patriot to protect his country from its government.” —Thomas Paine
Although Congress subjects the Nation to its impeachment-flavored brand of bread-and-circus politics, our civil liberties continue to die a slow, painful, death by a thousand cuts.
Case in point: Although Americans have been fixated on the carefully orchestrated impeachment drama that continues to monopolize headlines, Congress passed and president Donald Trump signed into law legislation extending three key provisions of the USA Patriot Act, which had been set to expire December 15, 2019.
Once again, to no one’s surprise, the bureaucrats on both sides of the aisle, Democrats and Republicans alike, prioritized political grandstanding over their oath of office to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. Journalist Norman Solomon writes for Salon, “The cave-in was another bow to normalizing the U.S. government’s mass surveillance powers.”
That, right there, is the key: Normalizing the U.S. government’s mass surveillance powers.
In the 18 years since the USA Patriot Act, a massive 342-page wish list of expanded powers for the FBI and CIA, was rammed through Congress in the wake of the so-called September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, it has snowballed into the eradication of every vital safeguard against government overreach, corruption, and abuse.
The Patriot Act drove a stake through the heart of the Bill of Rights, violating at least six of the 10 original amendments, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Amendments, and possibly the 13th and 14th Amendments, as well.
The Patriot Act redefined terrorism so broadly that many non-terrorist political activities such as protest marches, demonstrations, and civil disobedience, are now considered potential terrorist acts, thereby rendering anyone desiring to engage in protected First Amendment expressive activities as suspects of the surveillance state.
The Patriot Act justified broader domestic surveillance, the logic being that if government agents knew more about each American, they could distinguish the terrorists from law-abiding citizens, no doubt a reflexive impulse shared by small-town police and federal agents alike.
According to Washington Post reporter Robert O’Harrow, Jr., it was a fantasy that “had been brewing in the law enforcement world for a long time.” And 9/11 provided the government with the perfect excuse for conducting far-reaching surveillance and collecting mountains of information on even the most law-abiding citizen.
Federal agents and police officers are now authorized to conduct covert black bag “sneak-and-peak” searches of homes and offices while you are away and confiscate your personal property without first notifying you of their intention or their presence.
The law granted the FBI the right to come to your place of employment, demand your personal records, and ask questions of your supervisors and fellow employees, all without notifying you; allowed the government access to your medical records, school records and practically every personal record about you; and allowed the government to secretly demand to see records of books or magazines you’ve checked out in any public library and Internet sites you’ve visited. At least 545 libraries received such demands in the first year following passage of the Patriot Act.
In the name of fighting terrorism, government officials are permitted to monitor religious and political institutions with no suspicion of criminal wrongdoing; prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they tell anyone that the government has subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation; monitor conversations between attorneys and clients; search and seize Americans’ papers and effects without showing probable cause; and jail Americans indefinitely without a trial, among other things.
The federal government made liberal use of its new powers, especially through the use, and abuse, of the nefarious national security letters, which allow the FBI to demand personal customer records from Internet Service Providers, financial institutions and credit companies at the mere say-so of the government agent in charge of a local FBI office and without prior court approval.
In fact, since 9/11, we’ve been spied on by surveillance cameras, eavesdropped on by government agents, had our belongings searched, our phones tapped, our mail opened, our E-mail monitored, our opinions questioned, our purchases scrutinized (under the USA Patriot Act, banks are required to analyze your transactions for any patterns that raise suspicion and to see if you are connected to any objectionable people), and our activities watched.
We’re being subjected to invasive patdowns and whole-body scans of our persons and seizures of our electronic devices in the Nation’s airports. We can’t even purchase certain cold medicines at the pharmacy anymore without it being reported to the government and our names being placed on a watch list.
It’s only getting worse, folks.
Largely due to the continuous noise from television news’ talking heads, most Americans have been lulled into thinking that the pressing issues are voting in the next election, but the real issue is simply this: The freedoms in the Bill of Rights are being eviscerated.
We can pretend that the U.S. Constitution, which was written to hold the government accountable, is still our governing document. However, the reality we must come to terms with is that in the America we live in today, the government does whatever it wants, freedom be damned.
What once were considered inalienable, fundamental rights are now mere privileges to be taken away on a government bureaucrat’s say-so.
To those who have been paying attention, it should come as no real surprise.
I make clear in my, book “Battlefield America: The War on the American People,” the U.S. Constitution has been on life support for some time, and is drawing its final breaths.
The American government, never a staunch advocate of civil liberties, has been writing its own orders for some time. Indeed, as the McCarthy era in the 1950s and the wiretapping of Martin Luther King, Jr. in the 1960s and others illustrates, the government’s amassing of power, especially in relation to its ability to spy on Americans, predates the passage of the Patriot Act in 2001.
What the Patriot Act and its subsequent incarnations did was legitimize what previously had been covert and frowned upon as a violation of Americans’ long-cherished privacy rights.
As long as government agencies are allowed to make a mockery of the very laws intended to limit their reach, curtail their activities, and guard against the very abuses to which we are being subjected on a daily basis, our individual freedoms will continue to be eviscerated so that the government’s powers can be expanded, the Constitution be damned.
—The Rutherford Institute