“This is jackboots in the morning. This is an American nightmare that they would arrest somebody like this.” —Judge Andrew Napolitano
For too long now, the American people have allowed their personal prejudices, and politics to cloud their judgment and render them incapable of seeing that the treatment being doled out by the government’s lethal enforcers has remained consistent, no matter the threat.
Take Roger Stone, one of president Donald Trump’s longtime supporters, for example.
This is a guy accused of witness-tampering, obstruction of justice, and lying to Congress.
As far as we know, this guy is not the kingpin of a violent mob or drug-laundering scheme. He’s been charged with a political crime. So what does the FBI do? Send 29 heavily-armed agents in 17 vehicles to carry out a SWAT-style raid on Stone’s Florida home just before dawn January 25. They pound on his door, point automatic weapons at him, and terrorize his wife and his dogs.
Overkill? Sure.
Yet another example of government overreach and brutality? Definitely.
But here’s the thing: Although Tucker Carlson and Chris Christie and other Trump apologists appear shocked that law enforcement personnel would stage a military assault against an unarmed 66-year-old man who has been charged with a nonviolent crime, it is nothing new.
Indeed, it is blowback; one more vivid example of how the government’s short-sighted use of immoral, illegal, and unconstitutional tactics become dangerous weapons turned against the American people.
To be clear, it is far from the first time a SWAT team has been employed in non-violent scenarios.
Nationwide, SWAT teams routinely invade homes, break down doors, kill family pets, often shoot the dogs first, damage furnishings, terrorize families, and wound or kill those unlucky enough to be present during a raid.
SWAT teams have been employed to address an astonishingly trivial array of so-called criminal activity or mere community nuisances: Angry dogs, domestic disputes, improper paperwork filed by an orchid farmer, and misdemeanor marijuana possession, to give a brief sampling. In some instances, SWAT teams are even employed, in full armament, to perform routine patrols.
As the role of paramilitary forces has expanded to include involvement in nondescript police work targeting nonviolent suspects, the mere presence of SWAT units actually has injected a level of danger and violence into police-citizen interactions that was not present as long as these interactions were handled by traditional civilian officers.
There are few communities without a SWAT team today.
In 1980, there were roughly 3,000 SWAT team-style raids in the US.
Incredibly, that number since has grown to more than 80,000 SWAT team raids per year.
Where it becomes a problem of life and death for Americans is when these militarized SWAT teams are assigned to carry out routine law enforcement tasks.
No longer reserved exclusively for deadly situations, SWAT teams are increasingly being deployed for relatively routine police matters such as serving a search warrant, with some SWAT teams being sent out as much as five times a day.
• Police in both Baltimore and Dallas have used SWAT teams to bust up poker games.
• In Arizona, a SWAT team was used to break up an alleged cockfighting ring.
• An Atlanta SWAT team raided a music studio, allegedly out of a concern that it might have been involved in illegal music piracy.
• A Minnesota SWAT team raided the wrong house in the middle of the night, handcuffed the three young children, held the mother on the floor at gunpoint, shot the family dog, and then forced the handcuffed children to sit next to the carcass of their dead pet and bloody pet for more than an hour while they searched the home.
These incidents are just the tip of the iceberg.
It is what happens when paramilitary forces are used to conduct ordinary policing operations, such as executing warrants on nonviolent defendants.
Unfortunately, general incompetence, collateral damage, fatalities, property damage, and botched raids tend to go hand in hand with an overuse of paramilitary forces.
In some cases, officers misread the address on the warrant.
In others, they simply barge into the wrong house or even the wrong building.
In another subset of cases, such as the Department of Education raid on Anthony Wright’s home, police conduct a search of a building where the suspect no longer resides.
SWAT teams have even on occasion conducted multiple, sequential raids on wrong addresses or executed search warrants despite the fact that the suspect is already in police custody. Police have raided homes on the basis of mistaking the presence or scent of legal substances for drugs. Incredibly, these substances have included tomatoes, sunflowers, fish, elderberry bushes, kenaf plants, hibiscus, and ragweed.
Unfortunately, the shock-and-awe tactics utilized by many SWAT teams only increases the likelihood that someone will get hurt.
Aiyana Jones is dead because of a SWAT raid gone awry. The seven-year-old was killed after a Detroit SWAT team, in search of a suspect, launched a flash-bang grenade into her family’s apartment, broke through the door, opened fire, and hit the little girl who was asleep on the living room couch. The cops weren’t even in the right apartment.
The problems inherent in these situations are further compounded by the fact that SWAT teams are granted “no-knock” warrants at high rates such that the warrants are rendered practically meaningless.
This sorry state of affairs is made even worse by U.S. Supreme Court rulings that essentially have done away with the need for a no-knock warrant altogether, giving the police authority to disregard the protections afforded American citizens by the Fourth Amendment.
In the process, Americans are rendered altogether helpless and terror-stricken as a result of these confrontations with the police.
Indeed, terrorizing is a mild term to describe the effect on those who survive such vigilante tactics. Yet this type of terrorizing activity is characteristic of the culture that we have created.
Indeed, I document in my book, “Battlefield America: The War on the American People,” it is increasingly evident that militarized police armed with weapons of war who are empowered to carry out pre-dawn raids on our homes, shoot our pets, and terrorize our families have not made America any safer or freer.
—The Rutherford Institute